Eurydice (eurydice72) wrote,
Eurydice
eurydice72

Grammar question

Question for the grammar nazis, because I can't find a definitive answer anywhere and it's driving me batshit crazy.

Standard English syntax is SVO (subject-verb-object). OVS (object-subject-verb) has been colloquialized as Yoda speak. My question is regarding the latter.

If you invert syntax to start a sentence with a single word direct object, with nothing else coming between the direct object and the subject (and its modifiers if there are any), do you separate the direct object via a comma?

I know and have found support for the separation of an inverted direct object if the direct object is a phrase or clause, but nobody seems to agree (when I can even find the variation) on whether a single word direct object merits the same punctuation. I have found examples of both, but none of them are from what I would consider a creditable source.

Seriously, I wasted an hour trying to find a definitive answer to this and it's given me a massive headache. It stalled me out on editing something because I couldn't resolve it to my satisfaction. Because yes, I really am that anal. (Craig gave me grief about not being able to let it go, stating nobody would likely notice anyway, but the fact of the matter is that *I* would.)
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 3 comments